Across the United States, a powerful debate is unfolding around a bold initiative known as “Project 2025.” Introduced by the conservative Heritage Foundation and supported by a network of right-wing organizations and political figures, the project lays out a comprehensive plan to reshape the federal government. For its backers, it’s a way to bring accountability, efficiency, and traditional values back into Washington. But for others, especially scholars and civil liberties advocates, it looks like a roadmap to authoritarianism.
At the center of Project 2025 is a push to dramatically increase the power of the president. The plan calls for dismantling much of the current “administrative state” — the network of federal agencies, departments, and civil servants that are designed to function with a degree of independence. Supporters argue that this system has become bloated, inefficient, and unaccountable. But critics warn that weakening these institutions threatens democracy itself by removing critical checks on executive power.
The project does NOT stop at theory. It offers a detailed strategy for how a future conservative administration — possibly led again by Donald Trump — could seize control from day one. It includes firing large numbers of career civil servants, removing protections that allow them to do their jobs without political pressure, and replacing them with loyalists. Instead of a government run by experts, we could see one driven by political interests.
One major target of Project 2025 is regulatory agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Education, and the Department of Justice. These agencies play a key role in protecting public health, ensuring fairness, and upholding the rule of law. The proposal suggests cutting their budgets or restructuring them significantly. Advocates say this will stop government interference. But many worry that it will also strip away important protections for ordinary citizens, and hand more power to large corporations and political insiders.
The philosophy behind Project 2025 leans heavily on the idea of returning to so-called “traditional values.” While that phrase might sound comforting and valuable to some, it often serves as a cover for rolling back progressive social policies and promoting a narrow, conservative vision of society. It envisions a country guided by religious norms, cultural conformity, and rigid social hierarchies. These are not just policy goals — they reflect a deeper effort to shape American identity, similar to how authoritarian regimes like those in Russia, Balarus or China mold national narratives.
One of the most concerning parts of the plan is its intent to use government power to combat what it calls “woke ideology” — a vague term that has come to mean anything from teaching about systemic racism to promoting LGBTQ rights. The danger is that in trying to root out this so-called ideology, the state could end up censoring important discussions about history, identity, and justice. When a government starts deciding what can and cannot be said or taught, it steps closer to becoming an authoritarian force.
And even more troubling is the way Project 2025 deals with disagreement. In a healthy democracy, dissent is welcomed. It is a sign that people care and are engaged. But in this vision, critics are seen as enemies. The plan suggests tighter control over education, media, and civil society, turning them into tools of a unified political message. That starts to look a lot like surveillance states, where loyalty to the leader is more important than freedom of thought or speech.
Legal scholars and civil rights groups are increasingly warning that Project 2025 isn’t just a bunch of policy suggestions. It’s a highly organized framework that could shift the United States toward authoritarian rule. The playbook is all too familiar: weaken the judiciary, politicize law enforcement, centralize authority, and undermine the independence of institutions.
USA, indeed, has long been seen as a symbol of freedom, debate, and diversity. But with projects like this gaining traction, the country faces a defining choice. Will it embrace a future where power is concentrated in the hands of a few, where questioning the government is discouraged, and where conformity is enforced? Or will it recommit to democratic values — to free expression, equality, and civic responsibility?
In a world where authoritarianism is on the rise — not just in America, but globally — these are questions every citizen must confront. Because the future of any democracy depends not just on laws and institutions, but on the people’s willingness to protect them.
—
For further reading:
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/17/us/politics/trump-second-term-plans.html
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/heritage-foundation-project-2025
https://www.seo-forum-seo-luntan.com/other-languages/adska-kontraproduktivnost
https://www.npr.org/2024/01/30/project-2025-trump-heritage-foundation
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_2025
About the Author
